Online Redistricting Tool Contract Ending
Legislative Enrolled Maps
Redistricting 101
Redistricting Technical Changes Adopted
On January 30th, Governor Gary Herbert signed into law SB 125, HB 286, and HB 287, three bills that incorporated minor technical tweaks to the districts for State Senate, State House, and State Board of Education. The following link to the Lieutenant Governor’s web page displays the updated maps.
Redistricting Technical Changes
At the request of county clerks around the state of Utah, the Utah State Legislature in conjunction with the Lieutenant Governor’s Office has proposed minor modifications to the redistricting maps passed during the special session in October 2011. These changes are necessitated by small voting precincts and incorrect municipal boundaries provided by the U.S. Census Bureau. The following links lead to pdf’s with the proposed changes and the relevant bill pages. Read more 
Lieutenant Governor Greg Bell: 2012 Political District Maps
The Lieutenant Governor’s Office launched the Utah Political District Maps website that displays interactive maps of the State House, State Senate, State Board of Education and Congressional Districts recently passed by the Utah State Legislature. These maps are considered the official boundary maps for the four types of districts. This site will also incorporate minor technical changes allowed by S.B. 3005, a bill passed at the end of the redistricting special session.
A link to this web site is provided below.
Congress: Leonard S. Plaizier “Fair 4 Utah Compromise”
Deviation From Ideal Population
Largest District: 0.00% (+1 people)
Smallest District: 0.00% (-0 people)
The following plan was submitted by Leonard S. Plaizier through the online redistricting tool. This plan is also publicly available within the online tool. Read more
Congress: Derrick Richins “sl utah county split”
Deviation From Ideal Population
Largest District: 0.06% (+424 people)
Smallest District: -0.05% (-335 people)
The following plan was submitted by Derrick Richins through the online redistricting tool. This plan is also publicly available within the online tool. Read more
Congress: Derrick Richins “layer cake”
Deviation From Ideal Population
Largest District: 0.07% (+502 people)
Smallest District: -0.04% (-284 people)
The following plan was submitted by Derrick Richins through the online redistricting tool. This plan is also publicly available within the online tool. Read more
Congress: Derrick Richins “compromise”
Deviation From Ideal Population
Largest District: 0.04% (+283 people)
Smallest District: -0.04% (-271 people)
The following plan was submitted by Derrick Richins through the online redistricting tool. This plan is also publicly available within the online tool. Read more
Congress: Derrick Richins “Final Congressional Map revised”
Deviation From Ideal Population
Largest District: 0.01% (+37 people)
Smallest District: -0.00% (-30 people)
The following plan was submitted by Derrick Richins through the online redistricting tool. This plan is also publicly available within the online tool. Read more
Congress: Kyle Cooper “Cooper 2″
Deviation From Ideal Population
Largest District: 0.00% (+34 people)
Smallest District: -0.01% (-81 people)
The following plan was submitted by Kyle Cooper through the online redistricting tool. This plan is also publicly available within the online tool. Read more